Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

32.7

Rank #254 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 19.5.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index53.132.7
Released2026-09-21—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14271210
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14131208
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14071208
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1422—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13891160
LMArena Chinese14551192
LMArena Russian13971187
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14041186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14131194

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13991218
LMArena Creative Writing13911199
LMArena Multi-Turn13931221
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper