Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Laguna M.1

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Laguna M.1 Poolside

32.5

Rank #256 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 3 categories and Laguna M.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 60.3 to 21.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 56% for DeepSeek V4 Flash and 0% for Laguna M.1.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Laguna M.1 specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
ProviderDeepSeekPoolside
Noometry Index53.632.5
Released2026-04-242026-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output393K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
LMArena WebDev15821349
FrontierCode18.8%—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
LMArena Coding1457—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1444—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench—15.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
ProofBench56%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
LMArena Math1427—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Laguna M.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
LMArena Expert1441—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Laguna M.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1468—
LMArena French1439—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Laguna M.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
LMArena Instruction Following1421—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Laguna M.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
LMArena Longer Query1434—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Laguna M.1: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashLaguna M.1
LMArena Text1432—
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Laguna M.1?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Laguna M.1 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Laguna M.1 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper