Model comparison
Command R+ vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 9.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 5% for Command R+ and 49.4% for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command R+.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 128K.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 53.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 500K |
| Max output | 4K | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1427 |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R+: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1413 |
| DTBench | 54.9% | 96% |
| LMCA | 5% | 49.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | 153.53 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1422 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command R+: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1400 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1404 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Command R+ or Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Command R+ lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command R+ or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Grok 4.7 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.