Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 46.7.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1307 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1257 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1269 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1250 |
Multimodal Hunyuan Large Vision leads
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1243 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1250 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1279 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1253 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.