Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 15.5.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Step 5 Preview specifications
OLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)StepFun
Noometry Index29.747.9
Released2024-12-312026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.02M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$2.70
Results tracked1218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%
LiveBench Coding10.4%—
LMArena Coding—1480

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
CritPt—20.9%
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%—
LiveBench22.1%—

Math Step 5 Preview leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
ProofBench—42%
Omni-MATH15.6%—
LiveBench Math13.6%—
LMArena Math—1470

Knowledge Step 5 Preview leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
MMLU-Pro31%—
GPQA (HELM)31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1470

Multimodal Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision—1267

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English—1432
LMArena Chinese—1519
LMArena Russian—1436
LMArena Spanish—1439

Instruction Following Step 5 Preview leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%—
IFEval73%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1444

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text—1442
LMArena Creative Writing—1410
WildBench68.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1447
LiveBench Language11.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Step 5 Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper