Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Llama 13b

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.3 leads 58.5 to 13.8.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Llama 13b specifications
Grok 4.3Llama 13b
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index43.824.4
Released2026-04-172023-02-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked4021

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
LMArena Coding1415683
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Llama 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts1396728
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16100.58
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
BIG-Bench Hard—37.9%
ForecastBench60.3—
HellaSwag—79.2%
LAMBADA—75.2%
PIQA—80.1%
WinoGrande—73%

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
LMArena Math1388838
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—
GSM8K—20.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Llama 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—
LMArena Expert1385—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—52.7%
BoolQ—78.7%
MMLU—47.7%
OpenBookQA—56.4%
TriviaQA—77.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Llama 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
LMArena Vision1229—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
ScienceQA—43.3%

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
LMArena Non-English1385819
LMArena Chinese1422—
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1356—
LMArena Russian1399—
LMArena Spanish1398—

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
LMArena Instruction Following1366781

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Llama 13b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
LMArena Longer Query1393—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama 13b
LMArena Text1397834
LMArena Creative Writing1380794
LMArena Multi-Turn1406753
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Llama 13b?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or Llama 13b better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Llama 13b share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper