Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Llama 13b
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 683 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1444 | — |
| LMArena German | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | — |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Llama 13b?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Llama 13b better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Llama 13b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.