Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 13.8.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Qwen3 Max specifications
Llama 13bQwen3 Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.443.7
Released2023-02-242025-09-23
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding6831456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts7281448
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58142.38
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
LMArena Math8381446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1455
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English8191429
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1449
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1397
LMArena Korean—1399
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following7811419

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%
LMArena Longer Query—1438

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3 Max
LMArena Text8341439
LMArena Creative Writing7941402
LMArena Multi-Turn7531446

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3 Max share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper