Model comparison

Llama 13b vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 13.8.

Side by side

Llama 13b and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Llama 13bMiniMax-M3
ProviderMetaMiniMax
Noometry Index24.443.8
Released2023-02-242026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked2141

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding6831469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts7281447
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58146.95
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
ForecastBench—61.4
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math8381429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
LMArena Expert—1461
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English8191420
LMArena Chinese—1463
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following7811433

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query—1445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text8341433
LMArena Creative Writing7941404
LMArena Multi-Turn7531442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and MiniMax-M3 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper