Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Mistral Nemo
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| Cybench | 39% | — |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Mistral Nemo?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.