Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Mistral Nemo
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 83.3% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 29.9% for Mistral Nemo.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| SciCode | 41.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 83.5% | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 118.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | 881 |
| LMArena Text | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Mistral Nemo?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Mistral Nemo share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.