Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Qwen Turbo
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.1 leads 38.9 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | — |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Qwen Turbo?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.