Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 41.8 to 33.7.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1418 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1416 |
Math Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.1: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1397 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.