Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs o4-mini

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

o4-mini OpenAI

41.6

Rank #132 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 4 categories and o4-mini in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 54.0.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index43.141.6
Released—2025-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked960

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
LMArena Coding14181368
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—45%
Aider Polyglot—72%
GSO—3.6%
WeirdML—52.6%
CadEval—62%
ALE-Bench—826.17
AlgoTune—1.72

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—53.2%
GDPval—25.3%
METR Time Horizons—63.9%

Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14161351
ARC-AGI-2—6.1%
SimpleBench—38.7%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.6%
ARC-AGI-1—58.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EnigmaEval—9.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—77.6%
LMCA—26.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.64
ForecastBench—61.8

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—36.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4—4.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—81.7%
Omni-MATH—72%
LMArena Math—1389
MATH Level 5—97.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—24.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
GPQA Diamond—79.6%
Humanity's Last Exam—18.1%
SimpleQA Verified—19.6%
MMLU-Pro—82%
Confabulations—15.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—18.6%
GPQA (HELM)—73.5%
LMArena Expert—1343

Multimodal o4-mini leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
LMArena Vision11801194
GeoBench—64%
VPCT—57.5%

Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
LMArena Non-English13821337
LMArena Chinese—1354
LMArena French—1364
LMArena German—1336
LMArena Japanese—1308
LMArena Korean—1312
LMArena Russian—1334
LMArena Spanish—1347

Instruction Following o4-mini leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
LMArena Instruction Following13971321
IFEval—92.8%

Long Context o4-mini leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
LMArena Longer Query14041315
Fiction.LiveBench—77.8%

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)

BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5o4-mini
LMArena Text14051353
LMArena Creative Writing13881294
LMArena Multi-Turn14221350
Short-Story Creative Writing—75%
WildBench—85.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than o4-mini?

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or o4-mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.8 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and o4-mini share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.

Related comparisons

Go deeper