Model comparison
Seed 2.0 Pro vs Grok 4.1
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
ByteDance SeedSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 4.1 in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 43.5 to 33.7.
Side by side
| Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance Seed | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.2 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2026-02-14 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1472 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: —, Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1453 | 1435 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 28.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 57.1% | — |
Math Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1439 | 1422 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1440 | 1417 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), Grok 4.1: —
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1274 | — |
Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads
Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1441 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1489 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1442 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1408 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1449 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1460 | 1438 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | 1400 |
Long Context Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Seed 2.0 Pro | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1406 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1437 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than Grok 4.1?
Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Seed 2.0 Pro or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and Grok 4.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.