Model comparison
GLM-4.6 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6 scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 23.7.
- GLM-4.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-09-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 29 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GLM-4.6: 40.1 (#148), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1449 | 1418 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1340 | — |
| SciCode | 38.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 340.82 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 32.3 (#66), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 24.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 72.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GLM-4.6: 23.7 (#172), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | 1416 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 47.4% | — |
| CritPt | 1.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 39.1 (#111), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.6: 40.2 (#124), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 53.5 (#66), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1426 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1499 | — |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1393 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1419 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1436 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
GLM-4.6: 74.3 (#98), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1410 | 1397 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.6: 43.4 (#94), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6 leads
GLM-4.6: 61.1 (#90), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1440 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1422 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6 has 29 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.