Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Grok 4.1 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 40.9 to 33.7.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1390 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1399 |
Math Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1414 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1395 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1374 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Grok 4.1 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.5 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Grok 4.1 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.