Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 5 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 48.6 to 31.6.
  • Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderxAINVIDIA
Noometry Index33.731.8
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked349

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding12871025
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts12721047
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math12831072
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English12821063
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following12701060
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1276998

Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text13051098
LMArena Creative Writing12841091
LMArena Multi-Turn12901058
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper