Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 mini vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 mini OpenAI

33.5

Rank #232 Confirmed

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.2

Rank #265 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 5 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where GPT-4.1 mini leads 73.9 to 54.5.
  • Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index33.531.2
Released2025-04-14—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$1.60—
Results tracked479

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.1 mini leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 30.4 (#286), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding13671025
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)23.9%—
Aider Polyglot32.4%—
SciCode40.4%—
WeirdML37.6%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.9%—
CadEval16%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 33.0 (#52), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard50.5%—

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 10.9 (#335), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts13491047
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark48.6%—
ARC-AGI-13.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LMCA21.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.01—

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 23.1 (#264), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math13431072
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)6.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202544.7%—
Omni-MATH49.1%—
MATH Level 587.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)4.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#183), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
GPQA Diamond65.8%—
SimpleQA Verified12.7%—
MMLU-Pro78.3%—
GPQA (HELM)61.4%—
LMArena Expert1338—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 mini: 35.2 (#77), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Vision1181—

Multilingual GPT-4.1 mini leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 45.9 (#161), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English13181064
LMArena Chinese1329—
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1291—
LMArena Korean1298—
LMArena Russian1324—
LMArena Spanish1319—

Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 73.9 (#113), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following13321061
IFEval90.4%—

Long Context GPT-4.1 mini leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#270), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1344998
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.1 mini leads

GPT-4.1 mini: 48.8 (#193), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 miniLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text13411098
LMArena Creative Writing13001091
LMArena Multi-Turn13541058
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1147—
WildBench83.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

GPT-4.1 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.1 mini or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

GPT-4.1 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.4 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper