Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #266 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.5 to 48.6.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index33.731.9
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—131K
Max output—105K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—

Reasoning Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
SimpleBench22.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—6.5%
Thematic Generalization—20.3%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1272—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English1282—
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1270—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Longer Query1276—

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text1305—
LMArena Creative Writing1284—
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1476
LMArena Multi-Turn1290—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper