Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
NVIDIASummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Codellama 70b Instruct leads 37.6 to 29.9.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 31.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1047 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
Multilingual Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1063 |
Instruction Following Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1060 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |
Writing & Preference Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.