Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1299 |
Math Too close to call
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | 1289 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1273 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.