Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 33.9.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1286 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.