Model comparison
Gemini Advanced 0514 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini Advanced 0514 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 36.6 (#205), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1255 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 24.6 (#160), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1248 | 1299 |
Math Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 35.5 (#181), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1272 | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 33.3 (#205), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1215 | 1289 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 42.6 (#192), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1274 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1274 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1275 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1242 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1232 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 66.0 (#212), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1253 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemini Advanced 0514: 38.0 (#207), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1253 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemini Advanced 0514: 48.5 (#200), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemini Advanced 0514 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1279 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini Advanced 0514 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini Advanced 0514 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini Advanced 0514 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.