Model comparison
Mercury vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Mercury and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 24.8 to 16.8.
Side by side
| Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Mercury: 38.1 (#164), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1323 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mercury: 16.8 (#288), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | — |
Math Not comparable
Mercury: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1298 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1289 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Mercury: 41.7 (#201), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1259 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mercury: 65.3 (#220), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1238 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Mercury: 38.3 (#193), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1264 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Mercury: 46.2 (#216), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)
| Benchmark | Mercury | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1283 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Mercury and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Mercury or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.1 vs 37.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.