Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Qwen2-72B
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 21.2.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 30.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-06-07 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1171 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1240 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1169 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1181 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1192 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1196 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Qwen2-72B?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or Qwen2-72B better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Qwen2-72B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.