Model comparison
Gemma 7B vs Granite 4.2 30b
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 53.8 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1048 | 1396 |
| HumanEval+ | 28.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 43.4% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1042 | 1374 |
| Adversarial NLI | 48.7% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.99 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.2% | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 79% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228), Granite 4.2 30b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1066 | — |
| GSM8K | 46.4% | — |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1001 | 1406 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.1% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 78.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 72.3% | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 999 | 1340 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1035 | 1414 |
| LMArena Russian | 993 | 1343 |
| LMArena French | 1025 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1017 | 1347 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1022 | 1359 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads
Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)
| Benchmark | Gemma 7B | Granite 4.2 30b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1056 | 1361 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 963 | 1339 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 7B better than Granite 4.2 30b?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 7B or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Granite 4.2 30b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.