Model comparison

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Granite 4.2 30b

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B Google

29.7

Rank #292 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.4

Rank #126 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 38.5 to 16.0.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index29.741.4
Released2024-10-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2111

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221), Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding12181394

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242), Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts12101375
DTBench50%—

Math Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.6%—
LMArena Math1207—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285), Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert11851405
GPQA Diamond33%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Vision1044—

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English12151340
LMArena Chinese12311415
LMArena Russian12361342
LMArena French1233—
LMArena German1206—
LMArena Japanese1150—
LMArena Korean1140—
LMArena Spanish1212—

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following11991346

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query12191359

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227), Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text12261363
LMArena Creative Writing12181294
LMArena Multi-Turn11851340

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper