Model comparison
GPT-5 Mini vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
GPT-5 Mini and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Mini scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5 Mini leads 46.7 to 38.7.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-08-07 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 60 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GPT-5 Mini: 40.1 (#146), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1406 | 1390 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 64.7% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 59.8% | — |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 39.7% | — |
| SciCode | 39.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 799.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.38 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5 Mini: 31.1 (#70), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 34.8% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 55.5% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -31.18 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Mini: 23.9 (#168), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1380 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 70.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 54.3% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 8.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 10% | — |
| DTBench | 80.5% | — |
| LMCA | 34.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.52 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61 | — |
Math GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 46.7 (#69), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1378 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 86.7% | — |
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 72.2% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 97.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 27.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 45.6 (#86), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1379 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 19.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 21.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 83.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 75.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5 Mini: 35.6 (#85), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1202 | — |
| VPCT | 40.2% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Mini: 48.9 (#137), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1385 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1362 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1386 | — |
| LMArena German | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1355 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-5 Mini leads
GPT-5 Mini: 76.2 (#46), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | 1374 |
| IFEval | 92.7% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-5 Mini: 41.9 (#132), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1355 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5 Mini: 55.2 (#148), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Mini | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1373 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1325 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1363 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1313 | — |
| WildBench | 85.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Mini better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
GPT-5 Mini and Hunyuan T1 20250711 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.8 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is GPT-5 Mini or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.1 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Mini and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.