Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 30.1.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Granite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index37.450.3
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev11921629
LMArena Coding13121534
SciCode—60.9%
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12931512
CritPt—26.6%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math13121494
ProofBench—70%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert13091543

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English12611474
LMArena Chinese13371529
LMArena Russian12401480

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12691493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12751501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text12901492
LMArena Creative Writing12511468
LMArena Multi-Turn12681464

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper