Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 19.9.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 50.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1534 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1629 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1512 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1494 |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1543 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.