Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

36.8

Rank #202 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 24.6.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Granite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index36.849.8
Released—2026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev11901532
LMArena Coding13131497
DeepSWE—54.9%
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts12941490
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.18

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math1311—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert13101485
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1304

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English12611479
LMArena Chinese13351519
LMArena Russian12381494

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following12681466

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query12751483

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text12911486
LMArena Creative Writing12491444
LMArena Multi-Turn12691504
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper