Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

29.0

Rank #318 Confirmed

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4 Fast leads 38.9 to 12.0.
  • Granite 4.0 Micro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and Grok 4 Fast specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index29.039.4
Released2025-10-022025-09-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.017—
Output $ / M tokens$0.11—
Results tracked830

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
LMArena WebDev—1159
WeirdML—42.9%
LMArena Coding—1429

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
τ²-bench Banking—15.7%
Cybench—30%
LMArena Search—1171

Reasoning Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
ARC-AGI-2—5.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.1%
ARC-AGI-1—48.5%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1412
DTBench—82.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.2
ForecastBench—60.5

Math Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%—
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1419

Knowledge Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
GPQA Diamond28.3%—
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—19.7%
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—
LMArena Expert—1411

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Non-English—1396
LMArena Chinese—1457
LMArena French—1431
LMArena German—1383
LMArena Japanese—1352
LMArena Korean—1357
LMArena Russian—1389
LMArena Spanish—1415

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1387

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1415

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Text—1407
LMArena Creative Writing—1387
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1414

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Grok 4 Fast?

Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Grok 4 Fast share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper