Model comparison

DeepSeek-V3 vs Granite 4.0 Micro

DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 9.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek

39.5

Rank #166 Confirmed

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

29.0

Rank #318 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3 scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 4.0 Micro in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-V3 leads 37.5 to 9.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 67.6% for DeepSeek-V3 and 28.3% for Granite 4.0 Micro.
  • Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.24 / $0.90 for DeepSeek-V3.
  • DeepSeek-V3 accepts more context: 164K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

DeepSeek-V3 and Granite 4.0 Micro specifications
DeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
ProviderDeepSeekIBM
Noometry Index39.529.0
Released2024-12-262025-10-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window164K131K
Max output164K118K
Input $ / M tokens$0.24$0.017
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$0.11
Results tracked608

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3: 42.3 (#106), Granite 4.0 Micro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
Aider Polyglot55.1%—
SciCode35.8%—
WeirdML36.1%—
BigCodeBench Instruct50%—
LiveBench Coding70.9%—
LMArena Coding1368—
BigCodeBench Complete62.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3: —, Granite 4.0 Micro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
METR Time Horizons49.6%—

Reasoning DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 20.5 (#236), Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
SimpleBench27.2%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.3%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning65.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1365—
DTBench64.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis60.9%—
LMCA15.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard87.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.94—
ForecastBench59.1—
HellaSwag88.9%—
LiveBench66.9%—
PIQA84.7%—
WinoGrande85.2%—

Math DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 32.1 (#219), Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%2.8%
Omni-MATH40.3%20.9%
LiveBench Math73.5%—
LMArena Math1373—
MATH Level 575.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 37.5 (#155), Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
GPQA Diamond67.6%28.3%
MMLU-Pro72.3%39.5%
GPQA (HELM)53.8%30.7%
Confabulations26.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%—
LMArena Expert1351—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU87.2%—
TriviaQA82.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3: 48.5 (#143), Granite 4.0 Micro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
LMArena Non-English1358—
LMArena Chinese1391—
LMArena French1385—
LMArena German1374—
LMArena Japanese1333—
LMArena Korean1319—
LMArena Russian1373—
LMArena Spanish1358—

Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 72.8 (#130), Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
IFEval83.2%84.9%
LiveBench Instruction Following81.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1345—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek-V3: 34.0 (#253), Granite 4.0 Micro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
Fiction.LiveBench50%—
LMArena Longer Query1352—

Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3 leads

DeepSeek-V3: 57.4 (#130), Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek-V3Granite 4.0 Micro
WildBench83%67%
LMArena Text1375—
LMArena Creative Writing1364—
Short-Story Creative Writing77%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1472—
LMArena Multi-Turn1389—
LiveBench Language49.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek-V3 better than Granite 4.0 Micro?

DeepSeek-V3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 9.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when DeepSeek-V3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3 or Granite 4.0 Micro?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3 lists at $0.24 and $0.90.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek-V3 does, with 164K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3 and Granite 4.0 Micro share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3 has 60 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper