Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

29.0

Rank #318 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 12.0.
  • Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index29.050.3
Released2025-10-022026-09-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K1.05M
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.017$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$0.11$0.87
Results tracked819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
LMArena Coding—1534
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
CritPt—26.6%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1512

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%—
ProofBench—70%
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1494

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPQA Diamond28.3%—
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—
LMArena Expert—1543

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena Russian—1480

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1493

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text—1492
LMArena Creative Writing—1468
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1464

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 13× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper