Model comparison

Claude 3 Sonnet vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Claude 3 Sonnet Anthropic

29.0

Rank #319 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3 Sonnet scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 10.7.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude 3 Sonnet and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Claude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderAnthropicXiaomi
Noometry Index29.050.3
Released2024-02-292026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked3019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 29.6 (#302), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding12231534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
WeirdML10.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct42.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete53.8%—
ALE-Bench—1,158
HumanEval+64%—
MBPP+69.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 3 Sonnet: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 20.5 (#237), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts11971512
CritPt—26.6%
DTBench53.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index120.7—
WinoGrande75.1%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 10.7 (#310), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math12131494
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.5%—
ProofBench—70%
MATH Level 518.2%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 21.1 (#276), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert11731543
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
MMLU75.9%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 25.2 (#125), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision9841264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 37.8 (#234), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English12051474
LMArena Chinese11891529
LMArena Russian12271480
LMArena French1229—
LMArena German1204—
LMArena Japanese1131—
LMArena Korean1128—
LMArena Spanish1204—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 62.8 (#235), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following11991493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 36.7 (#228), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12111501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Claude 3 Sonnet: 42.1 (#238), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 3 SonnetMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text12181492
LMArena Creative Writing11861468
LMArena Multi-Turn12271464

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 3 Sonnet better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 3 Sonnet or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 3 Sonnet and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3 Sonnet has 30 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper