Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 10.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 8K.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index29.150.3
Released2023-03-142026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K1.05M
Max output8K131K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$60$0.87
Results tracked3819

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding12541534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
ALE-Bench—1,158
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%
METR Time Horizons36.1%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12411512
CritPt—26.6%
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math12691494
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
ProofBench—70%
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert12111543
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English12461474
LMArena Chinese12421529
LMArena Russian12511480
LMArena French1283—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Spanish1261—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12411493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12441501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGPT-4MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text12631492
LMArena Creative Writing12441468
LMArena Multi-Turn12571464
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.

Is GPT-4 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper