Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

29.0

Rank #318 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 40.2 to 9.9.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderIBMMoonshot AI
Noometry Index29.043.6
Released2025-10-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.017—
Output $ / M tokens$0.11—
Results tracked818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena WebDev—1404
LMArena Coding—1484

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1443

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%—
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1442

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
GPQA Diamond28.3%—
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—
LMArena Expert—1440

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1254

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English—1406
LMArena Chinese—1449
LMArena French—1403
LMArena German—1413
LMArena Korean—1378
LMArena Russian—1404
LMArena Spanish—1447

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1430

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query—1435

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text—1420
LMArena Creative Writing—1381
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1427

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper