Model comparison
Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Llama 2-7B
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.8 to 28.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 28.6 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95), Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | 1002 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1404 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88), Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1009 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 98.54 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1443 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121), Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1438 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47), Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1254 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89), Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1406 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1450 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1403 | 969 |
| LMArena German | 1413 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1404 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | 1007 |
| LMArena Korean | 1378 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61), Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1430 | 1006 |
Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | 999 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads
Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91), Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Instant | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1379 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1029 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Llama 2-7B?
Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Llama 2-7B share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.