Model comparison
Gemma 4 31B IT vs Granite 4.0 Micro
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 3.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 31B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 4.0 Micro in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 73.3% for Gemma 4 31B IT and 2.8% for Granite 4.0 Micro.
- Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.09 / $0.34 for Gemma 4 31B IT.
- Gemma 4 31B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 29.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2025-10-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.09 | $0.017 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.34 | $0.11 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1366 | — |
| SciCode | 43.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1459 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 925.5 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122), Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 70.6% | — |
| CritPt | 1.4% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 53% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| LMCA | 39.3% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 30.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 142.74 | — |
Math Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81), Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1465 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151), Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 28.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 10.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1465 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | — |
| LMArena French | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1444 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61), Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1446 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 31B IT leads
Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96), Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 31B IT | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1368 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1120 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 31B IT better than Granite 4.0 Micro?
Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 3.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 31B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B IT or Granite 4.0 Micro?
Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 31B IT lists at $0.09 and $0.34.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 31B IT does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 31B IT and Granite 4.0 Micro share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 31B IT has 35 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.