Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 60.6 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderIBMMoonshot AI
Noometry Index31.643.6
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1418

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Coding11121484
LMArena WebDev—1404
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts10921443

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Math11431442

Knowledge Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Expert10871440

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1254

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English10371406
LMArena Chinese10631449
LMArena Russian10601404
LMArena French—1403
LMArena German—1413
LMArena Korean—1378
LMArena Spanish—1447

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following10881430

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query11221435

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text10961420
LMArena Creative Writing10711381
LMArena Multi-Turn10631427

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper