Model comparison
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 36.0 to 29.3.
Side by side
| GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.2 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-11-12 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads
GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.7 (#107), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1389 |
| ALE-Bench | 1,245 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 37.8 (#32), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 60.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 70.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
GPT-5.1-Codex: 29.3 (#218), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1384 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.