Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs Qwen3 14B
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 14B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.3 to 21.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 28.9% for GPT-4.1 nano and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
- GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.
- GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 35.5 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 33K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 14B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 31.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 19% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 14B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | 41% |
Reasoning Qwen3 14B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | 49.1% |
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 64% |
| LMCA | 5.5% | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | 138.23 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | 66.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | 63.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | — |
| LMArena German | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1198 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | — |
Long Context Qwen3 14B leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | — |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Qwen3 14B?
Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. GPT-4.1 nano costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen3 14B?
GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.
Is GPT-4.1 nano or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Qwen3 14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.