Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 14B

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B

Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B

Alibaba (Qwen)

35.5

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.3 to 11.8.
The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 14B specifications
	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
Provider	Google	Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index	28.1	35.5
Released	2025-03-12	2025-04
Weights	Open	Open
Context window	131K	131K
Max output	4K	8K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.04	$0.35
Output $ / M tokens	$0.08	$1.40
Results tracked	22	12

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 14B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
SciCode	—	31.6%
LMArena Coding	1230	—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 14B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	19.6%	41%

Reasoning Qwen3 14B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
Kagi LLM Benchmark	25.2%	49.1%
Chess Puzzles	0%	4%
DTBench	50.9%	64%
LMCA	2.8%	18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index	116.02	138.23
CritPt	—	0%
LMArena Hard Prompts	1253	—

Math Qwen3 14B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	7.5%	66.4%
LMArena Math	1239	—

Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond	23.2%	63.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate	6.4%	5.4%
LMArena Expert	1223	—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Qwen3 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English	1273	—
LMArena German	1281	—
LMArena Russian	1294	—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Qwen3 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following	1239	—

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench	—	62.5%
LMArena Longer Query	1273	—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Qwen3 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Gemma 3 4B	Qwen3 14B
LMArena Text	1291	—
LMArena Creative Writing	1271	—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	1068	—
LMArena Multi-Turn	1255	—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3 14B?

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 14B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 14B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.