Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen3 14B

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.4

Rank #324 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.0

Rank #222 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 14B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 14B leads 37.0 to 24.5.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3 14B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.435.0
Released2024-04-232025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$1.40
Results tracked3512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 14B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319), Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
SciCode—31.6%
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
LMArena Coding1093—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%

Reasoning Qwen3 14B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326), Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
Chess Puzzles0%4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1072—
DTBench—64%
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
LMCA—18.2%
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.23
HellaSwag76.7%—
LiveBench22.4%—
WinoGrande70.8%—

Math Qwen3 14B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258), Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.4%
LiveBench Math15.7%—
LMArena Math1111—

Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241), Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond—63.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.4%
LMArena Expert1045—
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275), Qwen3 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1021—
LMArena Chinese1021—
LMArena French1075—
LMArena German1044—
LMArena Japanese935—
LMArena Korean905—
LMArena Russian1022—
LMArena Spanish1084—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298), Qwen3 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1053—

Long Context Qwen3 14B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271), Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.5%
LMArena Longer Query1044—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295), Qwen3 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 14B
LMArena Text1073—
LMArena Creative Writing1037—
LMArena Multi-Turn1018—
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper