Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI

27.9

Rank #327 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 2 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 23.4 to 8.5.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderOpenAINVIDIA
Noometry Index27.935.9
Released2025-04-142024-06-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3817

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13061209
Aider Polyglot8.9%—
SciCode25.9%—
WeirdML19%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard33%—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12861202
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark33.3%—
ARC-AGI-10%—
CritPt0%—
DTBench52.5%—
LMCA5.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index129.62—

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math12741216
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202528.9%—
Omni-MATH36.7%—
MATH Level 570%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1%—

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert12721171
GPQA Diamond48.9%—
SimpleQA Verified6%—
MMLU-Pro55%—
GPQA (HELM)50.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Vision1063—

Multilingual GPT-4.1 nano leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12601206
LMArena Chinese12701214
LMArena German12881192
LMArena Japanese11981128
LMArena Russian12611219
LMArena French—1197
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following GPT-4.1 nano leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12671203
IFEval84.3%—

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12831225
Fiction.LiveBench25%—

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text12851225
LMArena Creative Writing12601203
LMArena Multi-Turn12771214
EQ-Bench Creative Writing946—
WildBench81.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.1 nano better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper