Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs QwQ-32B
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 50.6.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2024-11-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1325 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 59.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1324 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), QwQ-32B: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1313 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1354 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
Long Context QwQ-32B leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than QwQ-32B?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or QwQ-32B better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and QwQ-32B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.