Noometry

Model comparison

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs QwQ-32B

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 OpenAI

43.8

Rank #82 Confirmed

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.8

Rank #159 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher in 7 categories and QwQ-32B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads 62.6 to 50.6.
  • QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.839.8
Released—2024-11-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2136

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.6 (#122), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
LMArena Coding14131333
Aider Polyglot—20.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—44.6%
LiveBench Coding—72.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.4%

Reasoning Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 33.8 (#71), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts14241325
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning—83.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65%
Epoch Capabilities Index—137.6
ForecastBench—58.3
LiveBench—72%

Math Too close to call

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.6 (#134), QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
LMArena Math14071359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—59.2%
LiveBench Math—77.8%

Knowledge Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.2 (#137), QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
Confabulations16.6%15.6%
LMArena Expert14011324
GPQA Diamond—65.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.6 (#58), QwQ-32B: —

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
LMArena Vision1243—

Multilingual Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 52.9 (#76), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
LMArena Non-English14191305
LMArena Chinese14571378
LMArena French14461336
LMArena German14231313
LMArena Japanese14051262
LMArena Korean13961279
LMArena Russian14291297
LMArena Spanish14341354

Instruction Following Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.0 (#107), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
LMArena Instruction Following14031297
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.8%

Long Context QwQ-32B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#107), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
LMArena Longer Query14131308
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.6 (#72), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326QwQ-32B
LMArena Text14291329
LMArena Creative Writing14051288
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15011257
LMArena Multi-Turn14541314
Short-Story Creative Writing—80.2%
LiveBench Language—51.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than QwQ-32B?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and QwQ-32B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper