Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Qwen3.7 Flash
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 35× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 40.6.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1441 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1444 | — |
| LMArena German | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 35× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.