Noometry

Model comparison

ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

ERNIE 5.1 Baidu

43.1

Rank #87 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 41.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.

Side by side

ERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderBaiduAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.139.5
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked197

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Coding1488—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Search1227—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)23.4%43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LMArena Hard Prompts1481—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.62

Math Too close to call

ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LMArena Math1481—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
LMArena Expert1491—

Multilingual Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1455—
LMArena Chinese1507—
LMArena French1486—
LMArena German1470—
LMArena Japanese1422—
LMArena Korean1428—
LMArena Russian1459—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following1460—

Long Context Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1462—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkERNIE 5.1Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1468—
LMArena Creative Writing1440—
LMArena Multi-Turn1471—

Frequently asked questions

Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper